Lab Tests Find Painkiller in Samples of Pet Food

Lab Tests Find Painkiller in Samples of Pet Food
But tests don't find any melamine

September 7, 2007
A sample of pet food -- identified as CANIDAE dog food -- has tested positive for the painkiller acetaminophen, ConsumerAffairs.com has learned.

The findings are contained in a report issued by the ExperTox Inc. Analytical Laboratory earlier this week, which reveals its toxicologists detected acetaminophen in a sample of pet food listed as CANIDAE dog food.

We also confirmed the findings with the manager of the Deer Park, Texas, laboratory. “That is one of our reports,” Donna Coneley, lab manager, told us.

Coneley, however, said the sample arrived in a Ziploc bag and ExperTox cannot confirm the pet food is a CANIDAE product. The lab's customer, who was not identified because of a confidentiality agreement, identified the sample as CANIDAE pet food on ExperTox’s forms.

Coneley also confirmed the lab detected acetaminophen in the dog food, but she pointed out that the report doesn’t show the amount of painkiller found in the sample.
No melamine

ExperTox’s report also reveals its toxicologists did not detect cyanuric acid or melamine in the dog food tested.

Melamine is the chemical that triggered this year’s massive pet food recall. In March, Menu Foods recalled more than 60 million containers of dog and cat food the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said were tainted with melamine. That’s a chemical used to make plastic and fertilizers. It is not allow in pet or human food.

Thousands of dogs and cats nationwide suffered kidney problems or died after eating the tainted food.

The FDA said it found melamine in the imported wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate used to make the pet food. FDA officials traced the source of that contamination to two now-defunct companies in China.
Acetaminophen found in other brands

This latest finding of acetaminophen in dog food comes less than four months after ExperTox discovered the painkiller in about a half a dozen samples of pet food it tested.

The lab did not disclose the brands of pet food that tested positive for acetaminophen in May because of a confidentiality agreement.

But ConsumerAffairs.com learned two of those samples were Menu Foods’ Pet Pride "Turkey and Giblets Dinner" and Pet Pride "Mixed Grill.”

Grieving cat owner Don Earl of Port Townsend, Washington, told us he paid ExperTox to analyze those brands of pet food. He said the samples tested were the same lots and styles of food that he fed his cat, Chuckles, before she died in January 2007 after eating the Pet Pride food.

ConsumerAffairs.com confirmed those samples of cat food tested positive for acetaminophen. They also tested positive for the chemical cyanuric acid -- commonly used in pool chlorination.

But the samples of Pet Pride did not reveal any melamine contamination.
Not surprised

That finding didn’t surprise Earl.

“Melamine has impressed me as being a red herring since day one,” said Earl, who recently asked a federal court to force the FDA to investigate other toxins -- besides melamine -- as the culprit behind the pet food recall.

“The substance has been the subject of credible scientific tests and studies for decades. Nothing supports the theory it could be lethal even in amounts 10 times the highest reported to be present in the food. As to why no one is finding other toxins in the food, the simple explanation is no one is looking for other toxins in the food.”
FDA disputed earlier reports

The FDA disputed ExperTox’s earlier findings of acetaminophen in the pet food, saying it didn’t detect the painkiller in a handful of samples it tested. But ConsumerAffairs.com learned the FDA couldn’t confirm it tested the same lots and brands of pet food in which ExperTox found the pain medication.

ExperTox told us it tested 100 to 150 samples of pet food -- and detected acetaminophen in five of those samples. The FDA tested just a few samples of pet food for the painkiller.

“It’s easier to say that we can’t confirm something by looking at a few samples than to really investigate and continue investigating until you know something for sure,” Coneley told us. “I think this might have been a quick way to get everyone off their (FDA) backs.”

Coneley said her lab is not required to report its latest findings of acetaminophen in the dog food to the FDA.

“The clients consistently have done that,” she said.

We contacted the FDA late Thursday about ExperTox’s latest findings. We also contacted CANIDAE Pet Food, but the company did not return our calls.

CANIDAE Pet Food, which is headquartered in San Luis Obispo, California, states on its Web site that all its products are safe and not part of this year’s massive recall.

“It appears from the latest news within our industry that all recalls were from protein concentrates imported from China,” the company’s Web site states. “CANIDAE does not use any protein concentrates, or grain fractions and we do not import any ingredients from China or overseas.

“All CANIDAE and FELIDAE ingredients are of U.S. origin . . . We pride ourselves on making only the highest quality, all natural pet foods using the finest ingredients available that meet or exceed the nutrient profiles as established by the AAFCO Dog and Cat Food Nutrient Profiles.”

A lil Country Store

ASPCA opens investigation into unexplained dog deaths

Purina Denies Claim on Bichon Frise Deaths
ASPCA opens investigation into unexplained dog deaths

Sept.6, 2007
The insurance company that represents pet food giant Nestle Purina has denied any liability in the deaths of two Bichon Frise with champion bloodlines.

Meanwhile, ConsumerAffairs.com learned the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) is now reviewing the dogs’ medical records and their unexpected deaths.

The dogs suddenly died last year – within two months of each other. Their owner, Julie N. of Harlan, Kentucky, blames the deaths on Purina’s dry dog food – specifically Purina One, Purina ProPlan and Purina Dog Chow.

“I think there’s something wrong with the food,” she says. “There’s no other explanation for these dogs to suddenly die.”

They were both healthy. They were bred from champion bloodlines. And one of the dogs -- Beeble -- was just a puppy.

“She was a healthy 12-month-old Bichon Frise,” says Julie, who breeds and shows Bichon Frise. “But then she suddenly started drinking excessive amounts of water, was vomiting, and became very lethargic.”

Julie immediately took Beeble to the veterinarian.

But she died four days after he put her on antibiotics and started I.V. fluids.

“There’s no reason that puppy should have died,” Julie says. “Her parents had genetic clearance. She was a perfectly healthy dog.”

Two months later -- On October 26 -- another one of Julie’s healthy dogs unexpectedly died. In this case, it was her eight-year-old Bichon Frise, Kayla.

“Kayla was a healthy female who did pet therapy,” Julie says. “But then she started drinking enormous amounts of water. At first, I thought she might have diabetes. But the tests were negative on that.”
Autopsy Reveals Possible Link

Heartbroken and baffled by the dogs’ death -- and determined to find answers -- Julie had autopsies performed on Beeble and Kayla at the University of Tennessee’s Veterinary Teaching Hospital in Knoxville.

The autopsy report on Beeble revealed a possible connection between the puppy’s death and the food she ate.

Pathologists discovered problems with Beeble’s liver that were “consistent with exposure to a hepatotoxin such as aflatoxin.” Aflatoxins are poisons produced by fungus or mold. These toxins are often found in corn and other agriculture crops and commonly cause liver disease.

But how could Beeble become exposed to -- and ingest -- aflatoxins?

Simple.

“The aflatoxins could have come from the (dog) food,” Beeble’s veterinarian, Douglas Mickey, told ConsumerAffairs.com. He reviewed Beeble’s and Kayla’s autopsy reports and -- with Julie’s permission -- agreed to discuss them with us. “Aflatoxins are known to be found in moldy grains, like corn that would be in dog food.”

He added: “If you’re asking me if there’s a possible connection between the pet food and Beeble’s death, the answer is: you can’t rule that out.”

Aflatoxins in pet food have contributed to the deaths of more than 100 dogs in recent year, including:

• The deaths of 25 dogs in 1999. In that case, Doane Pet Care recalled more than one million bags of corn-based dry dog food tainted with aflatoxins. Fifty-four brands of dog food, including Ol’Roy, were part of that recall;

• The deaths of 100 dogs in 2005. In that instance, Diamond Food recalled some of its pet food because the moldy corn in the products contained aflatoxins.

Aflatoxins, however, are not linked to Menu Foods’ massive recall in March of 60 million containers of dog and cat food. That pet food recall -- the largest in U.S. history -- is blamed on melamine contamination in the imported wheat gluten and rice protein used to make the food.

Thousands of dogs and cats nationwide suffered kidney problems or died after eating the melamine-tainted food.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) traced the source of the melamine contamination to two now-defunct companies in China.
Kayla’s Death Remains a Mystery

Aflatoxins also didn’t play a role in Kayla’s death, Dr. Mickey told ConsumerAffairs.com

“That dog didn’t die from anything in her food,” he said. What caused her death remains a medical mystery.

Kayla’s autopsy report revealed she had “multiple organ mineralization,” which Dr. Mickey said was likely caused by an adrenal problem.

“But (the pathologists) couldn’t pinpoint on the autopsy what caused the mineralization of all those organs,” he said. “It would be consistent with adrenal or kidney problems, but her adrenal glands and kidneys were fine.

“Kayla’s death has puzzled everyone who has looked at it.” Everyone, that is, except Julie.

Despite the autopsy report, she’s convinced Purina’s dog food also contributed to Kayla’s death.
Purina Denies Claim

Purina’s insurance company, however, disagrees.

In a letter Julie received from Sedgwick Claims Management Services, a claim examiner states: “After careful review of the records from the University of Tennessee Veterinary Teaching Hospital, I must respectfully deny liability on behalf of Nestle’ Purina PetCare Company for this claim . . . neither Beedle’s (sic) nor Kayla’s medical problems would result from their diets.”

The insurance company, which misspelled Beeble’s name, concluded the puppy died from “severe hemorrhagic bronchopneumonia.” It also stated Kayla’s death “appeared to be steroid induced and most likely the result of Cushing’s syndrome.”

But Julie says the company reached that conclusion -- and sent its letter in mid-August -- without reading the entire autopsy reports.

“I immediately called the insurance company after I received the letter and asked them how they could disregard the pathologist’s finding that the problems with Beeble’s liver were consistent with exposure to aflatoxins,” Julie says. “And the claims adjuster told me she didn’t see that in the report…she admitted that she didn’t have a copy of the last page of the autopsy report.”

Julie re-sent that report.

“But a claim examiner called me later and said the company had reached the same conclusion…it wasn’t Purina’s fault. I asked them again about the aflatoxins and they just said Beeble died from pneumonia. They also said Kayla died from steroid induced Cushing’s syndrome, but she was never on steroids.”
No Comment

A spokesman for Purina declined to comment on the insurance company’s finding.

In a previous interview, spokesman Keith Schopp defended Purina’s handling of Julie’s concerns and said there were no aflatoxins in the company’s products in the Untied States.
ASPCA Reviewing Records

Meanwhile, ConsumerAffairs.com confirmed today that Julie’s case has captured the attention of the ASPCA.

We learned an ASPCA veterinarian is now -- at Julie’s request -- reviewing the medical records and autopsy reports on Beeble and Kayla. A spokeswoman said it’s too early to comment on any findings because the organization just received the documents on Tuesday.
Fighting For Justice for Her Dogs

Julie is also considering legal action, saying she’ll do whatever it takes to get justice for her dogs and other pets that might be at risk.

“I’m not doing this to make a profit,” she says. “I never wanted to pursue legal action in the first place. All I wanted was for Purina to take my information and check its food. But now they need to acknowledge that this has happened and make sure no one else’s pets die. I don’t want any other animals to die like mine.”

She adds: “You know that old (Shakespeare) saying that ‘something is rotten in the state of Denmark?’ Well, something is definitely rotten at Purina.”

lil Country Paws